<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007:  Year of the Jacksonian Revolt?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318</link>
	<description>Random rants from a civil servant in Houston, TX</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Houblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Creeping and Stupid Government Roundup</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Houblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Creeping and Stupid Government Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>[...] But never fear, citizens of Houston! While the mayor&#8217;s shell game continues apace, council member and NJR (Non-Jacksonian Republican and supporter of illegal alien daycare job centers) M. J. Khan is organizing the business people of southwest Houston, where many of the Katrina refugees settled. Strangely, this area has seen a spike in the crime rate, leading said businesspeople to take matters into their own hands. Or forgo business. A resturant that closes before supper? I expect to hear things like that in the fifth ward, or up on Lyons Ave. where the crack-whores walk. Not in Chinatown. On the other hand, the closet commies haven&#8217;t managed to abrogate the Second Amendment yet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But never fear, citizens of Houston! While the mayor&#8217;s shell game continues apace, council member and NJR (Non-Jacksonian Republican and supporter of illegal alien daycare job centers) M. J. Khan is organizing the business people of southwest Houston, where many of the Katrina refugees settled. Strangely, this area has seen a spike in the crime rate, leading said businesspeople to take matters into their own hands. Or forgo business. A resturant that closes before supper? I expect to hear things like that in the fifth ward, or up on Lyons Ave. where the crack-whores walk. Not in Chinatown. On the other hand, the closet commies haven&#8217;t managed to abrogate the Second Amendment yet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajacksonian</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>ajacksonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 13:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>I thank you for your excerpting!  I recently had to think about and address the question of Conservatism &lt;a href="http://thejacksonianparty.blogspot.com/2006/06/reasons-for-jacksonian-party.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  My excerpt of that is: 

"This brings up the question of what, exactly is, the aim of modern Conservatism?

As far as can be told it is a hodge-podge of economic conservatives, social conservatives, small government conservatives, big government conservatives, business conservatives, freedom from government conservatives and those who just generally take a look at the goings on by Liberals and shake their heads for various reasons. To put it simply, Conservatism has no moorings to hold on to after Ronald Reagan, and had some big problems actually trying to adhere to any even when he was in office. This mish-mash has led to a strange admixture in which nearly anyone can say they 'have conservative values' but not have any MEANING to that.

And if you think the Conservatives and the Republican Party have problems, the Liberals and Democratic Party have had it for decades."

I have never seen Jacksonianism fitting in with traditional Conservatism, unless you count wanting a 'just the basics, no frills, please' sort of government a Conservative ideal.  Which, apparently, is appealing to No Party, but to a large swath of We the People: 

"The Jacksonian Party asserts that wanting a small, simple and honorable government that the common man can understand and question so as to hold it accountable is something that is neither Liberal nor Conservative in its outlook. What it does do is assert that the Nation State is the highest form of representation of a People and that the rights and liberties enjoyed by the People are protected by that National government. "

This huge and multi-limbed thing that got developed and grown during the mid to late 20th Century ill serves Us today.  The modern threats are more closely akin to those &lt;a href="http://thejacksonianparty.blogspot.com/2006/05/21st-century-and-we-people.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;in the 19th&lt;/a&gt; and the Republic has the toolbox and toolkit necessary to address these things.  The response today would be more highly distributed because this is a powerful Nation with prosperous People, but that makes allowing the People to fight for the Republic in an orderly way not only necessary but a survival trait for the Republic.  We ignore the older tools and means at the very peril of Our freedoms, Our liberties and Our lives.  In an era when Nation States are no longer the main threat, and the enemies of the Union seek to use every weakness and every minor advantage to bring down the Nation, the Nation *must* use its tools to survive and stop the flow of goods and services to those enemies.

I actually, place Honor at the top of things with all activities flowing from it.  I do not mind if creditors with low credit are not available, the system is free to shift and change over time to make what works at a low cost and profit margin an always open niche for competition if it is allowed to have that opening.  My foreign and domestic policy outlooks, along with interim and long-term energy policies are those that use the tools the Federal Government has and puts them into the hands of those that are the most inventive and most needed for doing these things.  The entire industrialized base for this Nation is now hampered by physical and energy constraints, along with mineral wealth constraints.  By encouraging a move from these constraints in the long haul, America gets a new and vibrant frontier that will ALWAYS be open, so Free People can exercise freedom with known risks and due rewards.

No other political party wants to do these things:  protect the Nation, hunt down Our enemies, reward Friendship of those that have given it to us and align Our foreign policy to that, and give the People the tools necessary to do the hard work in helping to defend their Nation and hold just rewards and bounties available.  This is something I believe is now *feared* by the majority of political parties.

And yet, it is how a Republic of Free People remains Free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thank you for your excerpting!  I recently had to think about and address the question of Conservatism <a href="http://thejacksonianparty.blogspot.com/2006/06/reasons-for-jacksonian-party.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  My excerpt of that is: </p>
<p>&#8220;This brings up the question of what, exactly is, the aim of modern Conservatism?</p>
<p>As far as can be told it is a hodge-podge of economic conservatives, social conservatives, small government conservatives, big government conservatives, business conservatives, freedom from government conservatives and those who just generally take a look at the goings on by Liberals and shake their heads for various reasons. To put it simply, Conservatism has no moorings to hold on to after Ronald Reagan, and had some big problems actually trying to adhere to any even when he was in office. This mish-mash has led to a strange admixture in which nearly anyone can say they &#8216;have conservative values&#8217; but not have any MEANING to that.</p>
<p>And if you think the Conservatives and the Republican Party have problems, the Liberals and Democratic Party have had it for decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have never seen Jacksonianism fitting in with traditional Conservatism, unless you count wanting a &#8216;just the basics, no frills, please&#8217; sort of government a Conservative ideal.  Which, apparently, is appealing to No Party, but to a large swath of We the People: </p>
<p>&#8220;The Jacksonian Party asserts that wanting a small, simple and honorable government that the common man can understand and question so as to hold it accountable is something that is neither Liberal nor Conservative in its outlook. What it does do is assert that the Nation State is the highest form of representation of a People and that the rights and liberties enjoyed by the People are protected by that National government. &#8221;</p>
<p>This huge and multi-limbed thing that got developed and grown during the mid to late 20th Century ill serves Us today.  The modern threats are more closely akin to those <a href="http://thejacksonianparty.blogspot.com/2006/05/21st-century-and-we-people.html" rel="nofollow">in the 19th</a> and the Republic has the toolbox and toolkit necessary to address these things.  The response today would be more highly distributed because this is a powerful Nation with prosperous People, but that makes allowing the People to fight for the Republic in an orderly way not only necessary but a survival trait for the Republic.  We ignore the older tools and means at the very peril of Our freedoms, Our liberties and Our lives.  In an era when Nation States are no longer the main threat, and the enemies of the Union seek to use every weakness and every minor advantage to bring down the Nation, the Nation *must* use its tools to survive and stop the flow of goods and services to those enemies.</p>
<p>I actually, place Honor at the top of things with all activities flowing from it.  I do not mind if creditors with low credit are not available, the system is free to shift and change over time to make what works at a low cost and profit margin an always open niche for competition if it is allowed to have that opening.  My foreign and domestic policy outlooks, along with interim and long-term energy policies are those that use the tools the Federal Government has and puts them into the hands of those that are the most inventive and most needed for doing these things.  The entire industrialized base for this Nation is now hampered by physical and energy constraints, along with mineral wealth constraints.  By encouraging a move from these constraints in the long haul, America gets a new and vibrant frontier that will ALWAYS be open, so Free People can exercise freedom with known risks and due rewards.</p>
<p>No other political party wants to do these things:  protect the Nation, hunt down Our enemies, reward Friendship of those that have given it to us and align Our foreign policy to that, and give the People the tools necessary to do the hard work in helping to defend their Nation and hold just rewards and bounties available.  This is something I believe is now *feared* by the majority of political parties.</p>
<p>And yet, it is how a Republic of Free People remains Free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubu Roi</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubu Roi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>I agree that Noonan is wrong; the new party &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; be to the traditional right (though I suspect it's going to have some surprising "leftist" traits relating to personal freedom).  As for the Democrats, they may be irrelevant statewide, but they've still got the upper hand here in the city of Houston, and don't even mention Berkeley East, a.k.a. city of Austin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Noonan is wrong; the new party <i>will</i> be to the traditional right (though I suspect it&#8217;s going to have some surprising &#8220;leftist&#8221; traits relating to personal freedom).  As for the Democrats, they may be irrelevant statewide, but they&#8217;ve still got the upper hand here in the city of Houston, and don&#8217;t even mention Berkeley East, a.k.a. city of Austin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 22:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Ubu, I feel the same way. (I admit to voting for Perot myself, and you know something, he might have been a nutjob, but what he was saying then has come true.) I think Noonan however is wrong, the third party, if it were to coelesce won't be in the center of the two existing parties, I think it will be to the right of the current GOP. Either that or the conservative base will drag the GOP kicking and screaming to the right. From the noise coming from the state GOP convention in SA, it sounds like the grassroots of the GOP is no more happy with the current crop of idiots than the rest of us are. Term limits will be enforced at the ballot box, I assure you. Bell coming in third or fourth in a four person race will only be proof that the democratic party has become irrelavent in Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubu, I feel the same way. (I admit to voting for Perot myself, and you know something, he might have been a nutjob, but what he was saying then has come true.) I think Noonan however is wrong, the third party, if it were to coelesce won&#8217;t be in the center of the two existing parties, I think it will be to the right of the current GOP. Either that or the conservative base will drag the GOP kicking and screaming to the right. From the noise coming from the state GOP convention in SA, it sounds like the grassroots of the GOP is no more happy with the current crop of idiots than the rest of us are. Term limits will be enforced at the ballot box, I assure you. Bell coming in third or fourth in a four person race will only be proof that the democratic party has become irrelavent in Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubu Roi</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubu Roi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>True, true.  Just as long as we don't get stupid enough to go for term limits again.  That's been a disaster for the City of Houston.  It's subtle, but it's bad.  Management by short-timers is not a good thing, especially when there are three 2-year terms invovled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, true.  Just as long as we don&#8217;t get stupid enough to go for term limits again.  That&#8217;s been a disaster for the City of Houston.  It&#8217;s subtle, but it&#8217;s bad.  Management by short-timers is not a good thing, especially when there are three 2-year terms invovled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zip77077</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>zip77077</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>Well, you have to fire a bunch up front to put the fear of their jobs in them. Once that's accomplished, they should start doing the people's work again. However, you have to zap a few bigwigs in the beginning regardless of whether they are good or bad just to get their attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you have to fire a bunch up front to put the fear of their jobs in them. Once that&#8217;s accomplished, they should start doing the people&#8217;s work again. However, you have to zap a few bigwigs in the beginning regardless of whether they are good or bad just to get their attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubu Roi</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubu Roi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>That's a start, and one I used in 1992 and 1996 on the presidential ballot (Perot, both times), but if what we're electing is worse, it's not a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a start, and one I used in 1992 and 1996 on the presidential ballot (Perot, both times), but if what we&#8217;re electing is worse, it&#8217;s not a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zip77077</title>
		<link>http://houblog.com/wp/index.php/2006/318#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>zip77077</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houblog.com/wp/?p=318#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>I've been discussing the general distaste left in my mouth by the actions of both state and federal Republicans lately with my Mother who lives in Pennsylvania. Up there the breaking point for the party was State Officials voting themselves a monstrous raise and increasing their pensions by even more. You can see the dissatisfaction of the voters by the fact that a bunch of incumbents including the 2 Senior State Senate Republican leaders got canned in the Primaries. Look for more shake ups in November.

I personally have gotten sick of the lack of action on anything but wedge election issues by all elected officials. I will not be voting for a single incumbent for the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been discussing the general distaste left in my mouth by the actions of both state and federal Republicans lately with my Mother who lives in Pennsylvania. Up there the breaking point for the party was State Officials voting themselves a monstrous raise and increasing their pensions by even more. You can see the dissatisfaction of the voters by the fact that a bunch of incumbents including the 2 Senior State Senate Republican leaders got canned in the Primaries. Look for more shake ups in November.</p>
<p>I personally have gotten sick of the lack of action on anything but wedge election issues by all elected officials. I will not be voting for a single incumbent for the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

